Tuesday, March 25, 2008

prophets and profits


“That is what is wrong with the world at present. It scraps its obsolete steam engines and dynamos; but it won’t scrap its old prejudices and its old moralities and its old religions and its old political constitutions.”
- George Bernard Shaw, Major Barbara.

Also old deadlines. They should be scrapped when no longer useful, along with the moralities that went along with them. Thankfully I 'forgot' (although I hold it was a conspiracy) that we were given an extension in my Shakespeare class until April 3rd.

Monday, March 17, 2008

One with the godhead, two with the cling

Have you explored your clingwrap fetish lately? How about your desire to wrap a minor dead celebrity with that roll in your kitchen cupboard? If you have not, let “Ulrich Haarburste’s Novel of Roy Orbison in Clingfilm” regale you.

Like many successful bloggers, Haarbürste – a pseudonym for Michael Kelly – decided to turn the idea behind his blog into a book. His variation on a theme is really a variation on a scenario: the first-person character, Haarbürste, has an overwhelming urge to wrap Roy Orbison in saran-wrap, or, clingfilm. Orbison, a live and Germanized version of himself in the book, consents under varying degrees of pressure to being wrapped completely in clingfilm by Haarbürste, which makes Haarbürste feel “one with the godhead.”

The sensuous quality to Haarbürste’s desire is not lost in the silliness, and the longer one reads about him and his pet turtle Jetta, the more one feels compassion towards his inexplicable fetish. In one postcard story prefacing the novel, Orbison and Haarbürste are in outer space. “As the clingfilm unfurls in languid arc in the zero gravity and then girdles him gently as I spiral around him … Tears of wordless joy leak from my ducts and float off like little jewels, crystallized moment of ecstasy, tiny universes of rapture, perfect unto themselves. ‘You are completely wrapped in clingfilm, Captain.’”

In the novel, neurotic Haarbürste and his turtle Jetta help black-garbed, sunglass-clad Orbison solve problems and fight Mexican bandits in Düsseldorf.

Part of the joy, and almost all the humour, comes from Haarbürste’s characters’ supra-polite and yet irrationally systematic behaviour stereotypically associated with Germans. The author’s ‘Germanification’ of English – a style which borrows German phrases and has a halting rhythm – allows the characters to be rigid and courtly. Roy’s response to Haarbürste’s recurring request to wrap him in clingfilm is always some variation of the following: “I see no reason to object. Commence to wrap me in clingfilm at once.”

The attempt to wrap Roy in clingfilm is always full of anxiety for Haarbürste, and the addition of evil-doers adds an extra degree of angst. The evil-doers are clownish and, like most cartoonish villains, overconfident.

“I began in the ordinary way, with littering and queue-barging,” explains one criminal to another. “I logically proceeded to murder and tax-evasion … I now take a positive delight in flouting the social conventions. I leave my shoe-laces untied, I do not comb my hair, and I am cavalier with the use of Umlauts.”

One criminal says that he crosses against the traffic light “for the sheer metaphysical evil of it.”

The melodrama and slapstick are highly amusing and kept me reading despite the frequent chapter breaks. The absurdity was the book’s biggest charm. The central turning point of the book comes when Roy reguses to be wrapped in clingfilm anymore, plunging Haarbürste into a suicidal melancholy. At this point I realized my attachment to the stubborn Haarbürste and my heart ached as his turtle Jetta watched him experiment with ways of killing himself that would not cause inconvenience to other people once he was dead. He was ready to tie himself up in a burlap bag for trash collection but he realized that if he killed himself with a knife, the trash collectors might cut their hands on it.

In an interview on his website, Kelly keeps up his serious veneer. When asked how many people see his stories as humorous, he replies, “I am not aware of anyone seeing it as humour … if people laugh that is nice, but I do not think my fans would class me as a humorist in the way that you would, say, Dan Brown.”

He explains the reason he chose Roy Orbison was that he was intrigued by his “mysterious and enigmatic quality.” He explains that clingfilm has always fascinated him since he was a child because “it is supple and sensuous, clinging and yet transparent.”

While admitting to not actually having met Roy Orbison, Kelly reiterates his hope:
“Only last week I was washing some dishes and I thought, 'What if Roy Orbison was forced to wash some dishes? There would be a danger of his clothes being splashed. What could be more logical than to wrap him in clingfilm to prevent this?' So it goes.”

My only critique? The book should come wrapped in clingfilm.
.

Labels:

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Regale me, please

I love the Globe and Mail, but recently I realized this is because I'm obsessed with the odd and the outré.

The Globe's blood-on-the-wall M.O. is to freak you out, man, and my desire for the "miraculous" and bizarre is always satisfied. (If you doubt this desire in yourself, I recommend that you sit in front of a History of Medical Deformities book for 5 minutes, and if you still haven't peeked, you a) have not fully explored your investigative urge. b) are still scrutinizing the deformed man on the cover.)

The paper is like the World Fair in bits and bites: my perfect intellectual snack.

Last weekend in the Style section, they featured a fishbowl bong filled with bees that you breathe into to see if you're sick. One of the things the bees can detect is whether or not you have cancer.

Bee #1: That breath is fuckin terrible!
Bee#2: Yup. It's cancer.

I can imagine all the terrible playground insults that will result from this knowledge. Cancer breath! Flu spit!

The bees can also tell whether you're pregnant. I don't think I would trust this conclusion to bees rolling around in breath particles, but hey, it could be a fun party game for guests.

The same article highlights the LED Dog Tail Communicator for pet owners who "wish to converse with their furry friends." The device draws words in the air with lights when a dog wags its tail. What will happen if I say something and the dog doesn't wag its tail? Will 'fuck you' will appear in the air? Generally that's what I feel my dog says to me when we're not engaged in our medieval greeting ceremony of bows and verbal/tail courtesies.

If you are ever in doubt of the supra-bizarre science-fiction reality that we now inhabit pick up a copy of the Globe. Even the business and news sections are creeping with stories that make excellent lunch conversation fodder in a "Isn't this shit crazy?" way. As my dog might say when I refuse to carry her up the stairs, "regale me, please."
.

Monday, March 10, 2008

I still haven't heard back

Last week I travelled to Edmonton on "government business" ie) I was interviewed for a job at parliament.

The out-of-town candidates were given an allowance for 4 meals - 2 dinners, 1 breakfast and 1 lunch. For some reason, we were allowed $35 for both dinners, but only $12.50 for lunch. Seeing as our plane left at 5 in the afternoon, we didn't really have time for dinner. Instead we had our "dinner" at 2 in the afternoon and skipped lunch.

I mailed my receipts today. I stapled them together and wrote which "meals" they were at the top of the receipt. This is my attempt to count a $6 rum as lunch.

If I don't get this job, at least I have the satisfaction of knowing the government paid for my gin, rum, and Sangria.

A toast to them.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Word of the Day

clam·bake [klam-beyk]
1.a picnic or social gathering at the seashore at which clams and other seafood are baked, sometimes with corn and other items, traditionally on hot stones under a covering of seaweed.
2.Informal. any social gathering, esp. a very noisy one.

[Origin: 1825–35, Americanism; clam1 + bake]


Dear Landlord,

There have been awful clambakes downstairs for the past 5 nights in a row. Please make them stop.

Sincerely,
your tenant

Rationalization? cue applause

In 1100, an Icelandic Viking named Bard left his wife to pillage all summer and did not return until fall. The separation was simple: neither felt much guilt (possibly because there was no Old Icelandic equivalent), and since there was no way to communicate or commute back and forth.

Accessible flights and phone calls have made long-distance relationships much more feasible today. Video phoning like Skype makes nude parleys across provinces, territories, and countries as simple as combing your hair. Text messaging, email, and cell phones are synthesized to your emotional grid.

I was in a café in Edmonton last week with three other women. It turned out, all of us were 'absentee-dating'. I was told one boyfriend works bi-weekly outside the city; another lives in Australia; one lives in Vancouver; mine lives in New Jersey.

The Australian boyfriend was coming for a visit that weekend, and the young woman was very excited. The rest of us tried to disguise our envious glumness. But then I thought about something else to be glum about.

A Google search for long-distance relationship reveals 3 million hits, most of which are intended as guides to surviving the separation. But nevermind love-making. With planes, trains, and automobiles, what about the carbon emissions? It’s tragically amusing to think that our love might literally be heating the globe.

If the economist Adam Smith were here he would say my relationship is inefficient - and not just because it's a monopoly. Basically, I should be taxed for the costs I impose on the environment and other people for flying to New Jersey.

You may say one or two trips a year doesn’t matter, but think of it this way: the more trips I take, the more opportunities I have to make unsustainable friendships. The more my tastes will broaden (I long at the moment for Munich Bratwurst and West African ginger drink), and the more I'll demand imports, both commercial and human.

The best solution is not to travel. We should globalize ourselves instead through 3D 360 degree live-stream videos and 360-page books. Similarly we should avoid all contact with locals we could be prone to wanting to visit in countries or regions where plane travel is necessary.

As for existing relationships, lovers could be given a 1-year grace period to move in together and reap the glorious benefits of the socialist car & house sharing utopia! Those who decide to dump their lover would receive a compensation package and an invitation to loverswap.com where you and another couple split in the same cities can boost your chances of rebound success by computerized matching. Ben may not exactly be Ken, but at least he has the same motorcycle. It almost makes you forget.

As a fade-in for a ban, we could subsidize people who are single or who stay close to their family.

A total ban on long-distance relationships would work in some ways. A friend of mine suggested mandatory declaring of long-distance relationships, whether romantic or not. When I noted that people would not do this voluntarily if they knew they were going to be taxed or arrested, he said the government would only need to make the penalty harsh enough that no one would dare lie.

This brings me to my next advantage of harsher environmental penalties: if more people were convicted and thrown in jail, global health would climb again. Everyone knows prisons have the smallest square-foot-to-inhabitant ratio. Prisoners can’t take airplanes. Prisoners can’t get fat. Home-made beer and local art. It’s an enticing solution.

It’s also one that makes people cringe. Will our society depend on totalitarian rule to get us out off this road leading into the toxic bog? Will eco-friendly living feel like a prison? It’s true that if flying were illegal, I would face the firing squad. I know I’m going to the pits of Nature’s hell. But my crimes are practically inevitable given our culture. Like Jean Valgeans in Les Miserables I steal resources from the earth because others depend on me to make that choice.

This summer, I’m packing up my covered wagon, and heading East. It's going to be a long trip, but when I get there, I'm going to meet a charming Hutterite who I met on loverswap.com...

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Das Publish Tutorial

A friend recently alerted me to a problem I've been aware of for a while now - that my webpage is formatted in German, and to post a comment you have to be able to read German. I've enjoyed this blissful paucity of feedback. Then again, there comes a time (usually around this time of year) when evaluations rip left and right, and we're left wondering how we can possibly re-build our self-arrogance. A conventional person, I don't want to be the odd person to still enjoy the consequence-free illusion of internet blogging, nor the person who is prejudiced against non-German speakers.

Here then, is the secret code, which you could have looked up on an online dictionary anyway, lazies. The French had no online dictionaries during WWII, how did they break the code?

When you click on kommentare at the bottom of the page, it'll bring you to another page where you can type your comments in the box. Please think only within the box, not outside it, lest you get confused. Below the box are two buttons. One says "veroffentlichen" but all you need to remember is that it's orange. That's the publish button. The other button - blue - says "Vorschau" which means preview. Get it? Fore-show.

Now leave me your comments you bastards.